I do this because I’ve repeatedly seen what studies show: Intermittent fasting (IF) has been shown to aid in weight loss, lower inflammation, improve gut health, and reduce their risk for cancer and other diseases. If only finding the right plan proved to be easy for everyone! Frustrated by the information overload, he modeled one of his co-workers, who did one 24-hour fast weekly. In other words, this co-worker ate normally six days a week, then completely fasted one day. That worked well for him. For Joseph—not so much. Joseph’s once-weekly fast quickly backfired and his colleagues and family testified to his snappy behavior. The foundation of IF is pretty simple: abstain from eating during certain time periods and eat during others. But even that yields some variation. So to cut through the confusion and determine which plan would work best for you, consider these options: Studies show this easier version of IF works well; one divided mice into four groups, all of which ate the same number of calories. One group could eat whenever they wanted and the other three groups ate during a 9-, 12-, or 15-hour window. Thirty-eight weeks later the eat-whenever-they-want mice gained weight (no surprise!) but the 9- and 12-hour eaters stayed lean even if they occasionally strayed from the plan. If you’re a newbie, this 12-hour fast plan is a great option to start with. When you don’t eat for 10 to 16 hours, your body reaches into its fat stores for energy—a desirable effect if your goal is losing weight. With this plan you might stop eating by 8 p.m. and have lunch at noon, thereby creating a 16-hour daily fasting window. Again, studies confirm the efficacy of this type of fasting; research shows1 an eight-hour eating window (versus eating whenever you want) can have beneficial effects on improving mensuration in women and reducing weight. On the 25 percent day, you eat strictly protein, vegetables, and some healthy fats—but no sugar or starches. One study2 on normal weight and overweight adults found that ADF was effective for weight loss and protecting the heart. In my practice, I’ve found this tricky and definitely for more advanced intermittent fasters. Patients sometimes find that the “feed days” create a slippery slope to eat more. An alternate tactic would be to completely fast every other day, but this can be hard to sustain over the long term. One study4 found that the 5:2 diet produced mild to moderate weight loss and consistent reductions in energy intake, all of which may benefit cardiometabolic health by decreasing blood pressure, insulin resistance, and oxidative stress. Again, those calorie-restricted days might be more of a challenge, especially if you have a hard time controlling yourself when you eat. It also may get confusing because not all calories are created equal. On the restricted days, the type of calories consumed is just as important as the number of calories. The focus needs to be on whole foods: protein, healthy fats, and vegetables. Proponents of this type of fasting suggest5 eating sensibly most of the time, eating nothing for an extended period every now and then, and indulging occasionally. This “anything goes” IF perspective works best when a health care professional custom-designs a plan for you rather than you whimsically deciding when to eat or not. Its flexibility, however, becomes ideal during vacations and other occasions when you know you’ll eat less-than-healthy foods. If you go it alone, I suggest starting with a 12-hour daily fast and easing into a 16- to 18-hour fast. As Joseph quickly discovered, immediately leaping into a more challenging plan could have unpleasant side effects. Regardless of which plan you choose, there are also a few caveats. Fasting for longer periods of time when your body isn’t prepared can yield serious consequences. If you feel lightheaded or weak, eat something. Fasting isn’t a magical “cure-all”; it’s simply another tool in your weight-loss and optimal-health arsenal. A cutting-edge nutrition deep dive taught by 20+ top health & wellness experts
